By Diane M. Mackie, David L. Hamilton
This quantity offers a set of chapters exploring the interface of cognitive and affective methods in stereotyping. Stereotypes and prejudice have lengthy been themes of curiosity in social psychology, yet early literature and examine during this region excited by impact on my own, whereas later stories centred totally on cognitive components linked to info processing concepts. This quantity integrates the jobs of either have an effect on and cognition with reference to the formation, illustration, and amendment of stereotypes and the results of those strategies for the escalation or amelioration of intergroup tensions.
* Reviewed improvement, upkeep, and alter of stereotypes and prejudice
* interplay of affective and cognitive methods as antecendents of stereotyping and prejudice
* have an effect on and cognitive outcomes of workforce categorization, preception, and interaction
* The interplay of cognitive and affective strategies in social perception
* Award successful bankruptcy "The Esses et al", was once the 1992 winner of the Otto Klineberg award given through the Society for the mental research of Social concerns, which stated the bankruptcy as having provided, "a tremendous boost in our realizing of easy mental strategies, underlying racism, stereotyping, and prejudice."
Read or Download Affect, Cognition and Stereotyping: Interactive Processes in Group Perception PDF
Best social psychology & interactions books
This quantity offers a particular review and research of where of social constructionism in social psychology. The author's arguments revolve round key questions: How can social constructionism account for adjustments in human identities? In what methods may perhaps social constructionism accommodate a task for nonhumans - no matter if technological or `natural' - within the structure of identification?
If, as Darwin indicates, evolution relentlessly encourages the survival of the fittest, why are people forced to dwell in cooperative, advanced societies? during this interesting exam of the roots of human belief and advantage, a zoologist and previous American editor of the Economist finds the result of contemporary reviews that recommend that self-interest and mutual reduction should not in any respect incompatible.
Unsleeping event and idea content material are in general handled as particular difficulties. This publication argues that they're now not. half One develops a chastened empiricist conception of content material, which cedes to event a vital function in rooting the contents of techniques, yet deploys an increased perception of expertise and of the ways that contents could be rooted in event.
Graham Wallas (31 may perhaps 1858 - nine August 1932) was once an English socialist, social psychologist, educationalist, a pace-setter of the Fabian Society and a co-founder of the London institution of Economics Wallas joined the Fabian Society in April 1886, following his pals Sidney Webb and George Bernard Shaw.
Additional info for Affect, Cognition and Stereotyping: Interactive Processes in Group Perception
How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. ), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 204-243). New York: Guil ford. Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessi bility. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. ), Attitude structure and function (pp. 153-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Fazio, R. , (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. ), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.
Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874-884. Petty, R. , Cacioppo, J. , Sedikides, C , & Strathman, A. J. (1988). Affect and persuasion: A contemporary perspective. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 355-371. , & Bargh, J. A. (1991). Stereotyping based on individuating information: Trait and global components of sex stereotypes under attention overload. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 26-47.
Results were only partially in line with the predictions sketched above. Relative to controls, happy participants did show a greater Stereotypie bias, but only when the judgments concerned negative group attributes. Also as expected, sad participants showed less Stereotypie bias when their judgments concerned negative group attributes; however, they did not do so when they concerned positive group attributes. Another recent study (Bodenhausen &c Kramer, 1990a) directly examined the proposed effects of happiness on stereotyping, as well as simultaneously considering the alleged differential effects of anger and sadness.